Free
Article: Why employee feedback plays a crucial
role in improving engagement levels.
 Employee
engagement has gained the attention it deserves
but little progress has been made at the coal
face with an ongoing Gallup study reporting that:
only 26% of the U.S. working population is engaged
(loyal and productive), 55% are not engaged (just
putting in time), and 19% are actively disengaged
(unhappy and spreading their discontent). Couple
these discouraging statistics with the cost of
staff turnover, estimated by Mercer to be between
50% to 150% of annual salary depending on the
role and level of seniority, and it quickly becomes
apparent why employee engagement is topical: the
lack of it is hurting employers on the bottom
line.
|
|
And
this trend isn't likely to go away: employers (60%
when surveyed) are commenting that they are finding
it hard to source talent. And over three quarters
of these rate the impact of the talent shortage
on their organisation as either high (66.6%) or
critical (9.26%). And because competition for employees
will continue to increase as the baby boomer population
ages we will hear more and more employers talking
about employee engagement until we learn how to
do it well.
So given that employee engagement is so important
today and that it will become even more pressing
in the future, why aren't more employers changing
their business practices to achieve engagement?
Could it be because despite extensive research on
the subject there are still misconceptions between
the employee and employer about what really keeps
employees engaged? A simple example of this relates
to why employees leave an organisation; the Saratoga
Institute conducted a survey and it revealed that
89% of managers believe employees leave for more
money. But, in fact, the survey found that 88% of
employees leave for reasons other than money. A
study by Mercer Human Resource Consulting conducted
in Australia in 2003 revealed that the most important
attributes that Australian employees value about
their job were: |
1.
The existence of opportunities for advancement,
2. Training, and
3. A clear career path.
It
was also important for employees to be proud of their
organisation and to have their achievements recognised
by the leadership. Accordingly, providing up-to-date
training and opportunities to participate in innovative
new projects help keep high performers motivated and
productive.
Need further convincing about the disconnect that exists
between employers and employees? Another study this
time carried out by Accenture, further supports the
findings above: pay is not likely to have the greatest
impact on employees' decisions to stay or leave an organisation.
Instead, data suggested that employees who were planning
to leave were most likely to do so for opportunities
that allowed them to use and develop their skills -
or for opportunities in a company with strong leadership.
This Accenture study compared satisfaction levels of
"committed" employees compared to those "planning
to leave soon" on 40 different topics of organisational
importance, such as strength of management, compensation,
training and workload. The topics with the widest disparities
between the two groups of employees - called "satisfaction
gaps" - are the key drivers of attrition. Pay,
usually considered the most emotional factor in the
employer/employee relationship, only ranked as the seventh
most significant driver of attrition. The widest gaps
(between 32-34 percentage points) were found in areas
such as "using my skills and abilities", "opportunity
for management" and "company has a clear sense
of direction"; consequently, those are the three
major indicators of attrition.
Yet another survey this time of 1,000 American workers
and human resource professionals conducted by USATODAY.com
and the American Society for Human Resource Management
(SHRM) found the top three aspects that are "very
important" to worker satisfaction are Job Security
(65 per cent), benefits (64 per cent) and communication
between employees and management (62 per cent). But
HR professionals had a rather different view of what
they thought workers needed to be satisfied with their
jobs. HR professionals ranked communication between
employees and management as most important (77 per cent),
followed by recognition by management (62 per cent)
and relationship with immediate supervisor (61 per cent).
What
does this research tell us about employee engagement?
Clearly
there is a large gap between what employers think are
the reasons for a lack of engagement and the real reasons
employees leave (or perhaps worse still remain but are
disengaged). And the different reasons reported in the
research mentioned above suggests that while it is nice
to be able to generalise the reasons behind a lack of
engagement the factors driving engagement may vary from
company to company. So, how do you overcome this variance
and as an employer find out what your employees want
from you to become engaged?
Asking
them is a great place to start.
Learn what your employees need to stay engaged and subsequently
retain them. There are many stages at which you can
establish just how engaged your employees are and learn
what areas the company needs to improve upon to ensure
employee engagement is raised and then maintained. The
five areas below are a good starting point to show your
employees that you value them enough to listen to them
and, where possible, change your business practices
to meet their needs:
1.
New hire or induction survey: an effective induction
process means that by the end of the first 4-6 weeks
of employment, new employees would have been provided
with information relating to each of the following
areas:
- resources
(what tools and training do they need to hit
the ground running?),
- routines
(which systems and regular events should they
be part of?) and
- relationships
(who do they need to connect with?)
|
Ask
questions to find out how your new hire found the
induction process. Did they get all the information
they need to be successful? Are they happy? Is the
"reality" of the role what was sold to them
before joining? By asking these types of questions
and then acting on the results, the gap between the
employer's expectations and the new hire's performance
can be more closely aligned, leading to
you
guessed it
more engaged staff.
2. Satisfaction or climate/culture survey:
do your employees feel happy? Or is there a general
air of discontent amongst staff? Why do they feel
the way that they do? What suggestions have they got
to improve their working environment and/or the culture
of the company? Would employees feel comfortable referring
a friend to work at your company? A regular staff
climate survey can provide employees with an appropriate
platform to voice concerns before they spiral out
of control. Pay heed to the information generated
at this level and you may find that keeping your staff
engaged is not as expensive as you thought it was
going to be.
3. Reward and recognition survey: employees
often specialise in either a technical or management
career track so each individual requires benefits
and opportunities that match their preferences. And
if they don't get a package that 'matters' to them
they are more likely to be disengaged. Designing an
appropriate benefits package means going beyond monetary
considerations. No matter how much money people earn,
financial compensation won't by itself maximise staff
performance or retain staff. Effective benefits packages
must combine two elements: tailoring to individual
needs, and clear links to organisational goals , and
a good reward and recognition survey can help ascertain
whether employees feel this is being delivered.
4. Training survey: most employers appear to
be 'awake' to the value of providing training to staff
- both as a way to reward and as a way to provide
further advancement up the ladder
but despite
this how many organisations actually take the time
to formally measure what staff really thought of the
training and how it benefited them? Do your questions
ever go beyond the trite, 'so what was the course
like?' to really ascertain if the employee benefited
from the money spent? Was the course content and duration
appropriate? Would they recommend the course for other
people in the company - have they got anyone specifically
in mind who could benefit? How will the person be
able to apply the training to improve their effectiveness?
5. Exit interview survey: what happens when
someone leaves your organisation? If you aren't asking
why the person is leaving using a structured interview
process you are missing an opportunity to help identify
the common issues you need to address to improve the
engagement of the remaining staff and to improve your
retention rates.
Start
small: choose one of the areas above and then start
to gather your information. Once gathered you'll be
in a better position to establish strategies more in
tune with what your employees really think. And as your
employees see you taking an active interest in their
needs and proactively changing business practices to
support these needs, employee engagement levels will
begin to rise and your staff turnover costs will reduce.
Trial
an Australian-built online employee engagement
survey tool:
PeoplePulse
is an Australian built online feedback and survey
tool used extensively by Australian and New Zealand
based organisations to conduct online employee
engagement surveys. The tool can also be used
by HR to conduct cost effective staff climate
surveys, training needs analysis surveys, exit
interviews, and 'new starter' feedback surveys
to name a few popular uses.

|
|
Please complete the
form below to arrange your FREE custom-branded
staff survey demonstration and a PeoplePulse pricing
and information sheet.
Upon
completing the form below, a PeoplePulse representative
will contact you to discuss your needs and current
situation. From there we will set up your demo
and arrange a suitable time to show the system
to you:
|
|
Please
be assured that your correspondence with us is confidential.
We will not divulge email addresses or any other details
you provide to outside sources.
The
above demonstration request form was powered by PeoplePulse.
Research
Sources:
Back
to top
|