| 
|
Employee
Engagement Free Article:
Why employee feedback plays a crucial role in improving engagement levels.Employee
engagement has gained the attention it deserves but little progress has been
made at the coal face with an ongoing Gallup study reporting that: only 26% of
the U.S. working population is engaged (loyal and productive), 55% are not engaged
(just putting in time), and 19% are actively disengaged (unhappy and spreading
their discontent). Couple these discouraging statistics with the cost of staff
turnover, estimated by Mercer to be between 50% to 150% of annual salary depending
on the role and level of seniority, and it quickly becomes apparent why employee
engagement is topical: the lack of it is hurting employers on the bottom line.
| |
And this trend isn't likely to go away: employers (60% when surveyed) are commenting
that they are finding it hard to source talent. And over three quarters of these
rate the impact of the talent shortage on their organisation as either high (66.6%)
or critical (9.26%). And because competition for employees will continue to increase
as the baby boomer population ages we will hear more and more employers talking
about employee engagement until we learn how to do it well. So given
that employee engagement is so important today and that it will become even more
pressing in the future, why aren't more employers changing their business practices
to achieve engagement? Could it be because despite extensive research on the subject
there are still misconceptions between the employee and employer about what really
keeps employees engaged? A simple example of this relates to why employees leave
an organisation; the Saratoga Institute conducted a survey and it revealed that
89% of managers believe employees leave for more money. But, in fact, the survey
found that 88% of employees leave for reasons other than money. A study by Mercer
Human Resource Consulting conducted in Australia in 2003 revealed that the most
important attributes that Australian employees value about their job were: |
1. The existence of opportunities
for advancement, 2. Training, and 3. A clear career path. It
was also important for employees to be proud of their organisation and to have
their achievements recognised by the leadership. Accordingly, providing up-to-date
training and opportunities to participate in innovative new projects help keep
high performers motivated and productive. Need further convincing about
the disconnect that exists between employers and employees? Another study this
time carried out by Accenture, further supports the findings above: pay is not
likely to have the greatest impact on employees' decisions to stay or leave an
organisation. Instead, data suggested that employees who were planning to leave
were most likely to do so for opportunities that allowed them to use and develop
their skills - or for opportunities in a company with strong leadership. This
Accenture study compared satisfaction levels of "committed" employees
compared to those "planning to leave soon" on 40 different topics of
organisational importance, such as strength of management, compensation, training
and workload. The topics with the widest disparities between the two groups of
employees - called "satisfaction gaps" - are the key drivers of attrition.
Pay, usually considered the most emotional factor in the employer/employee relationship,
only ranked as the seventh most significant driver of attrition. The widest gaps
(between 32-34 percentage points) were found in areas such as "using my skills
and abilities", "opportunity for management" and "company
has a clear sense of direction"; consequently, those are the three major
indicators of attrition. Yet another survey this time of 1,000 American
workers and human resource professionals conducted by USATODAY.com and the American
Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) found the top three aspects that
are "very important" to worker satisfaction are Job Security (65 per
cent), benefits (64 per cent) and communication between employees and management
(62 per cent). But HR professionals had a rather different view of what they thought
workers needed to be satisfied with their jobs. HR professionals ranked communication
between employees and management as most important (77 per cent), followed by
recognition by management (62 per cent) and relationship with immediate supervisor
(61 per cent). What does this research
tell us about employee engagement?
Clearly
there is a large gap between what employers think are the reasons for a lack of
engagement and the real reasons employees leave (or perhaps worse still remain
but are disengaged). And the different reasons reported in the research mentioned
above suggests that while it is nice to be able to generalise the reasons behind
a lack of engagement the factors driving engagement may vary from company to company.
So, how do you overcome this variance and as an employer find out what your employees
want from you to become engaged? Asking
them is a great place to start.
Learn what your employees need to stay engaged and subsequently retain them. There
are many stages at which you can establish just how engaged your employees are
and learn what areas the company needs to improve upon to ensure employee engagement
is raised and then maintained. The five areas below are a good starting point
to show your employees that you value them enough to listen to them and, where
possible, change your business practices to meet their needs: 1.
New hire or induction survey: an effective induction process means that by
the end of the first 4-6 weeks of employment, new employees would have been provided
with information relating to each of the following areas:
- resources (what tools
and training do they need to hit the ground running?),
- routines
(which systems and regular events should they be part of?) and
- relationships
(who do they need to connect with?)
| Ask
questions to find out how your new hire found the induction process. Did they
get all the information they need to be successful? Are they happy? Is the "reality"
of the role what was sold to them before joining? By asking these types of questions
and then acting on the results, the gap between the employer's expectations and
the new hire's performance can be more closely aligned, leading to
you
guessed it
more engaged staff.
2. Satisfaction or climate/culture survey: do your employees feel happy?
Or is there a general air of discontent amongst staff? Why do they feel the way
that they do? What suggestions have they got to improve their working environment
and/or the culture of the company? Would employees feel comfortable referring
a friend to work at your company? A regular staff climate survey can provide employees
with an appropriate platform to voice concerns before they spiral out of control.
Pay heed to the information generated at this level and you may find that keeping
your staff engaged is not as expensive as you thought it was going to be.
3. Reward and recognition survey: employees often specialise in either
a technical or management career track so each individual requires benefits and
opportunities that match their preferences. And if they don't get a package that
'matters' to them they are more likely to be disengaged. Designing an appropriate
benefits package means going beyond monetary considerations. No matter how much
money people earn, financial compensation won't by itself maximise staff performance
or retain staff. Effective benefits packages must combine two elements: tailoring
to individual needs, and clear links to organisational goals , and a good reward
and recognition survey can help ascertain whether employees feel this is being
delivered. 4. Training survey: most employers appear to be 'awake'
to the value of providing training to staff - both as a way to reward and as a
way to provide further advancement up the ladder
but despite this how many
organisations actually take the time to formally measure what staff really thought
of the training and how it benefited them? Do your questions ever go beyond the
trite, 'so what was the course like?' to really ascertain if the employee benefited
from the money spent? Was the course content and duration appropriate? Would they
recommend the course for other people in the company - have they got anyone specifically
in mind who could benefit? How will the person be able to apply the training to
improve their effectiveness? 5. Exit interview survey: what happens
when someone leaves your organisation? If you aren't asking why the person is
leaving using a structured interview process you are missing an opportunity to
help identify the common issues you need to address to improve the engagement
of the remaining staff and to improve your retention rates.
Start
small: choose one of the areas above and then start to gather your information.
Once gathered you'll be in a better position to establish strategies more in tune
with what your employees really think. And as your employees see you taking an
active interest in their needs and proactively changing business practices to
support these needs, employee engagement levels will begin to rise and your staff
turnover costs will reduce.
Trial
an Australian-built online staff survey tool:PeoplePulse
is an Australian built online feedback and survey tool used extensively by Australian
and New Zealand based organisations to conduct online employee surveys. The tool
can also be used by HR to conduct cost effective staff climate surveys, training
needs analysis surveys, exit interviews, and 'new starter' feedback surveys to
name a few popular uses. 
|
|
Please complete the form below to arrange your FREE
custom-branded staff survey demonstration and a PeoplePulse pricing and information
sheet.
Upon
completing the form below, a PeoplePulse representative will contact you to discuss
your needs and current situation. From there we will set up your demo and arrange
a suitable time to show the system to you: |
| Please be assured that your correspondence
with us is confidential. We will not divulge email addresses or any other details
you provide to outside sources.
The above demonstration request form was powered by PeoplePulse. Research
Sources:
|
|